A： Here is today's Morning News. In India , many women were raped(强奸) and killed after and ruin（毁尸） everyday. Even thought the local government have taken much stronger actions to control this conditions ,but the cases of rape or murderer（谋杀） are increasing day by day . So the Federal government（联邦政府） passed the law of death of penalty（死刑） to keep the society in a good state.
B： Murderers and terrorists should
be punished by death. If all murderers were executed（处死） ,there would be far less violent crime .And , anyway , if somebody deliberately（故意地） takes another person's life ,they have no right to live.
C： There's no evidence to show that the death penalty has any effect on the number of murderers. In the United States ,some states have the death penalty and some don't, but there is no noticeable（显而易见的） difference in the murder rates . Most killers act in the heat of the moment, and they don't seem to consider the consequences（后果） of their actions.
B： That's besides the point（离题的，不中肯的） .Why should we spend large amounts of money keeping murderers in prison for many years ? And why should they be free to kill more innocent people after they are released ? We have to protect society , and the only way to do this is by sentencing murderers and terrorists to death. C： The whole process of sentencing somebody to death is also very expensive. But that's not my main point. A far more important consideration is that if a society has the death penalty , it is telling every member of that society that violence and killing are ways to deal with problems. It also says that human
beings sometimes have the right to take other human beings’ lives . Shouldn't society be setting a better example ? D： Put a sock in it（住嘴）. You two just stop arguing about it. whether the murderers and terrorists should be punish by death have nothing to do with us. Let's play Majiang（麻将）,we are one player short（三缺一） ,Why not to come to fill in the gap?
因篇幅问题不能全部显示，请点此查看更多更全内容