There is no more fashionable solution to the current global recession than \"green jobs.\" Many countries are all eagerly promoting clean-technology industries. It sounds like the ultimate win-win deal: create jobs, cut down on energy dependence, and save the planet from global warming. Ever since the recession began, governments, environmental groups, and even labor unions have been spinning out reports on just how many jobs might be created by these new industries一estimates that range from tens of thousands to millions.
Those kinds of predictions, however, may be overoptimistic. As a new study from McKinsey points out, the clean-energy industry doesn't have much in common with old, labor-intensive manufacturing industries like steel and cars. A more accurate comparison would be to the semiconductor industry, which was also expected to create a boom in high-tech jobs but today employs mainly robots. Green-tech workers now make up only 0.6 percent of the American workforce. McKinsey figures that clean energy won't command much more of the total job
market in the years ahead.
On the other hand, a booming green sector could fuel job growth in other industries. Here, too, the story of the computer chip is instructive. Today the big chip makers like Intel employ only 0.4 percent of the U.S. workforce. But indirectly they helped create millions of jobs by making other industries more efficient.
McKinsey says that the same process could play out today if governments
focused less on building a clean-energy industry and more on greening every part of the existing economy. U.S. efforts to promote corn-based ethanol (乙醇），for instance, are incredibly counter-productive. The state is creating inefficient sectors,
with jobs that are not likely to last.
A better approach would be to push businesses and consumers to do the basics, such as to improve building insulation (绝緣材料）and replace outdated heating and cooling equipment. In places like California, 30 percent of the summer
energy load(能量荷载)is sucked up by air conditioning, so the state government
now offers low-interest loans for consumers to replace old units with more efficient ones. Consumers pay back the loans through their taxes. When that money is spent, it drives demand and thus job growth in other areas.
注意：此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。
1.What does the author say about \"green jobs\" in the first paragraph?
A) They inspire many countries to start going green.
B) They are proved to be a win-win deal in the end.
C) They are the most stylish way to deal with the recession.
D) They refer to the jobs in cleaning service industries.
2. Governments, environmental groups and labor unions predict that clean-energy industries ____________________________________________ .
A) can reduce their dependence upon energy
B) may offer a large amount of job vacancies
C) may bring huge profits to the whole society
D) can hold back global warming for good
3. Why does McKinsey say \"clean energy won't command much more of the total job market in the years ahead\" (Lines 5-6, Para. 2)?
A) The clean-energy industry is quite different from other industries.
B) The case of clean-technology is similar to semiconductor industry.
C) Clean-energy workers account for a small percentage of the US workforce.
D) Job vacancy is expected to boom in labor-intensive manufacturing industries.
4. In what way do the big chip makers like Intel contribute to the American labor market?
A) By creating millions of jobs for American labors.
B) By bringing more advanced working experience.
C) By making the US labor market more vigorous.
D) By improving the efficiency of other industries.
5. California state government allows consumers to update their air-conditioners with low-interest loans mainly because ________
A) consumers can use their taxes to pay back the loans
B) air-conditioning sucks up 30 percent of the energy load
C) it helps stimulate job growth in other industries
D) the state government is very wealthy and generous
因篇幅问题不能全部显示，请点此查看更多更全内容